JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 17, 1992

A- de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Julio Rafael Montoya Barrios

✓
Topic · hard data
Rechazo De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad. Control Jurisdiccional.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia
Corte Constitucional
Constitucion Politica
Control Jurisdiccional
4 topics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Rechazó la demanda No.

D-192 al considerar que es incompetente para resolver la demanda instaurada porque no cabe pronunciamiento de la Corte sobre la exequibilidad o inexequibilidad de artículos de la Carta de 1991, por el contrario, su función consiste en velar por la guarda de toda la Constitución y no en juzgar sus preceptos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la demanda No. D-192
  2. Segundo. NOTIFIQUESE este Auto al demandante, haciendole saber que procede el recurso de suplica ante la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional.
  3. Tercero. Una vez en firme este Auto, archivese el expediente.
  4. COMUNIQUESE, NOTIFIQUESE, PUBLIQUESE EN LA GACETA DE LA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL Y CUMPLASE
  5. ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
  6. Magistrado
  7. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alejandro Martínez Caballero
Reporting justice
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 022/92C-269/14 — Competencia De La Corte Constitucional Para Ejercer Control De Constitucionalidad Por Vía De Acción Pública, De Tratados Perfeccionados Con · cited 34 timesC-269/142014
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.